"Law abiding citizens" and criminals...blah,blah,blah!


Thursday, May 2, 2013


Gun owners should drop dumb argument

By Kelvin Wade
From page A11 | May 02, 2013 |

It’s time to shoot down the lamest argument in the gun debate. In what passes for the gun debate – whether it’s in Congress, on talk radio or in the letters to the editor of this and other newspapers – we hear opponents of tighter gun laws argue that new laws would only affect law-abiding citizens, since criminals won’t follow the laws.

What if we used this logic in other areas?

April was Sexual Assault Awareness Month and you may have noticed the various events SafeQuest Solano held, raising awareness and money for survivors. Never during any of the discussions did anyone stand up and ask why we even have laws against sexual assault, since rapists clearly ignore the laws. A rapist isn’t going to not rape simply because there’s a law against it. No, the law only stops law-abiding citizens from sexually assaulting people.

Sounds crazy, doesn’t it? Laws are in place to obviously set limits on behavior. For those who break the laws, there are consequences. That rapist will lose his freedom. That criminal who violates gun laws will lose his or her freedom.

We had a possible shooting on 2nd Street Monday night. I have no idea if the shooter purchased his or her gun legally. I know it’s illegal to have a concealed weapon in a car. It’s unlawful to discharge a weapon in the city. It’s illegal to shoot someone unprovoked. Those laws are in place so if someone violates them, he or she can be prosecuted.

I just had $400 worth of work done on my car so it would pass a smog check. Then I had to pay to register it. That’s because I’m a law-abiding driver. Sure it was a financial burden and hassle, but it’s the price I pay to operate a vehicle on the streets in this state. I’m also required to have insurance in order to drive.

There are scofflaws driving cars with expired or stolen tags that haven’t passed the smog test. About 14 percent of California drivers are driving without insurance. Perhaps we should rescind these laws since a portion of the public is ignoring them. It’s obvious the law only affects we law-abiding citizens.

This is silly because all universal background checks would do is require the rest of the nation do what we do here in California. It would require all gun sales whether in a store, gun show or private sale to go through a federally licensed dealer and have a background check. Background checks will help dry up some of the 40 percent of gun sales that are currently unregulated.

Universal background checks will make responsible gun owners end those private sales. And for those criminals who won’t do it, then they’ve broken the law and at least there’s recourse and consequences for that. That’s the point.

So enough of this ridiculous argument about criminals not following the law.

One more thing I hear during this debate is some gun owners saying they won’t comply with new regulations or new gun purchase registration. “From my cold dead hands!” the late National Rifle Association golden boy Charlton Heston used to wheeze while trying to hold a rifle over his head. So you law-abiding folks are telling us you’re not going to abide by new laws? What does that make you?

Peace.

______________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL NOTES: Several people are upset that I disrespected the great American hero Charlton Heston. Give me a #@*^ break. I like Heston. "Planet of the Apes" and "Omega Man" rocked. But I used him here as a stand in for those folks who want to defy new gun laws. You've seen even law enforcement officers across the country say they won't enforce any new gun laws. I'm saying if you live in a state that allows private gun sales with no background checks and the law is changed to require those sales to go through someone with an FFL and you continue to make private sales without one, then you're no longer "law abiding."

What's funny to me is that this column isn't even controversial. How the hell is it controversial? It's a dumb argument. There are lots of good arguments against gun control. I've made some of them myself when I've disagreed with the action some what to take. Assault weapons bans are worthless. But this dumb argument about criminals is so lazy and lame that no serious person should be making it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Matt Garcia

Image
Ten years ago, I woke up and turned on my laptop and went to the Daily Republic website and was devastated to learn of the shooting of Fairfield City Councilman Matt Garcia. I immediately called my brother Tony who answered and knew why I was calling. We shared our shock and horror. But mainly we just cried together on the phone. Later when Matt had been removed from life support and passed away I told Tony that it felt like hope itself had died. He told me, “Matt has inspired too many people to let hope die. But hope took a beating today.” It seemed like some horrible cosmic joke. Twenty-one year old Matt Garcia, elected to the Fairfield City Council on a platform of supporting youth and curbing violence is murdered on the streets of Fairfield. What's worse, his killer mistook him for someone else. It was a pointless act of evil in which a worthless example of a human being took the life of a priceless one. In 2007 Matt invited me to lunch at Joe's Buffet to discuss...
Read more

What if we could enforce our own driving laws?

Image
Thursday, June 6, 2013 Let’s all enforce our own driving laws By Kelvin Wade From page A11 | June 06, 2013 | Leave Comment Vallejo resident Anthony Cardenas, 52, became a local hero after painting his own crosswalk near his home on Sonoma Boulevard at Illinois Street. Cardenas claims the busy street is dangerous for pedestrians, so he painted the crosswalk and earned himself an arrest for felony vandalism and trip to jail for his trouble. Mr. Cardenas makes me want to place my tongue firmly in cheek and take matters into my own hands to make things safer. Have you ever had idiots zoom down your street in complete disregard for kids in the neighborhood? I’d love to creep outside at 3 a.m. with some cement and make my own speed bumps. The next time the speedsters come flying down my street, they’d make a sunroof with their own heads when they hit my new speed bump. BAM! Problem solved. Last week, my friend Nedra Polk asked me to write about the condition of Clay Bank Road between Air B...
Read more

The reason I've ditched my earphones at night

Monday, August 26, 2013 FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA Accident convinces me to ditch my iPad By Kelvin Wade From page A7 | August 22, 2013 | 4 Comments I’ve been an insomniac for years. I used to embrace my insomnia by putting on a pot of coffee at night and doing some of my best writing while the stars were out. I wrote about having a sleep study a couple of months ago and one of the things the analyst told me is I have to stay off my iPad in bed. That hasn’t happened. But recently, my girlfriend Cathi stumbled upon a cure for my nightly iPad habit. So there I was in the middle of the night in bed with earphones in listening to an awesome version of Paul McCartney and Wings’ “Live and Let Die” while pummeling various victims in “Words with Friends” on my iPad when I heard a boom. I turned on a lamp and saw my Beagle, Theo, panting at the bedroom door. I thought he’d jumped against the door to get my attention. Lately, he’s had to go out a lot at night (a dog with the bladder of a mouse...
Read more